Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Roland CM-220 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Roland CM-220
Images
1/11
Roland CM-220
francois.bibe francois.bibe

«  disappointing for the roland »

Published on 08/24/14 at 09:43
how long? One month I would say is the second since the first is gone and I have already mare ...

I had to try some yes (yam, hk)

what I like least?
1) a huge breath, even with no source connected perceptible 3m pregnant .. shame on a device these days! never heard so many blows on small speakers roland .. but you said this is normal .. then have to believe that the quality roland 90s of this world ..
2) sound a bit garish, real lack of mediums (which understand by seeing satelites), I had to put an equalizer for a less aggressive sound.

In conclusion for the sound, it's blah, it grows ok, but it screams dessuite, suddenly listening is not relaxed .. and for breath, no comment! when I watch a movie at the end when one goes out, they say almost (ah it feels good)

suddenly the value for money is way blah, since the use I make of (home theater, turntable, computer etc) is just wild! (Contrary to what roland claims when they consider that 2.1 can be used to (all)

blow with the experience I would not do that choice, I'll probably even let me pay ..

voila, after a bateuse to type on, probably ok! but listen, zero