View other reviews for this product:
Raymond BARRE « what the best price »
Published on 08/22/11 at 23:39PCI / rack, and a favorable opinion of users led me to this map.
Some dceptions with others too ...
She turns to record the guitar (Godin Multiac Ibanez electric or mainly) and many in midday, a track record in both.
The pramps are the same remaining light shoots back, they are not effective trs (but that price, there is the manufacturer to make a sales pitch)
Old config, but no major problem (pentium IV 2.4 and 2 gigabytes of ram, an old hard drive and motherboard asus P4P800 in short, something of what in 2000!)
Connections: see below
UTILIZATION
driver OK
I use Sonar X1 bought at the same time, I was working with Sonar 3 before.
I work on music and short remix so there are often 30 tracks at the same time or more.
Correct latency (useful for recording live at noon)
GETTING STARTED
Easy Installation
Setup output audio and rglage master and headphone unusual.
Incompatibility more or less, let's say I do not use in Sonar rglage prconis by Cakewalk for this card, which is also the one recommended by Echo Audio. Otherwise, I can not rgler my latency as I wish. In manual mode so I rule tracks qd my project is too "big" to lower the latency and to register properly. My config is a bit light so it's not a problem ncessairement card but more power from my PC.
Concise manual, advice and forums can be used for children under the rods particulire output connectors.
OVERALL OPINION
8 months of intensive use
I tested two other models before
I like its performance, sound clarity and PCI ct / rack (I do not like the USB)
I like the least connection and headphone jack mono when I go out from Sonar for example (though the output is from a reader STREO Winamp style) I go through the blow out of the monitors in order to be stro
It is the least of this card, you need a connection particulire out to the monitors (a double-jack-mono/double-RCA cable) to exit from Sonar in Stereo (or other) and two mono jacks to the monitor for Winamp because it uses two output paths DIFFERENT depending on the signal.
I explain: 1 & 2 for winamp and 3 & 4 to Sonar or 4 output jack derrire the box connect the monitors to get sound without using the routing and unplug and reconnect constantly moves from one derrire qd a soft one another. So you have to play with the volume because the monitors also work for the master output (1 & 2) but not the other (3 & 4) There is also the solution to mix small table between the rack and the speakers.
The cable does it score only 10 euros more in the end, but given the feedback, ease of use one hand and slap permanent sound for the price each use the other hand, is a worthwhile.
This time, it is not really CHRE and devilishly effective.
A choice I would do so without hsiter!
To get an ide sound I recommend cost of securities that are working well (mixing clear and dynamic, compared with a conventional drive or another card, I still can not for the price !)
if I have some personal work for the curious
https://soundcloud.com/search?q [fulltext] = regenerated
Some dceptions with others too ...
She turns to record the guitar (Godin Multiac Ibanez electric or mainly) and many in midday, a track record in both.
The pramps are the same remaining light shoots back, they are not effective trs (but that price, there is the manufacturer to make a sales pitch)
Old config, but no major problem (pentium IV 2.4 and 2 gigabytes of ram, an old hard drive and motherboard asus P4P800 in short, something of what in 2000!)
Connections: see below
UTILIZATION
driver OK
I use Sonar X1 bought at the same time, I was working with Sonar 3 before.
I work on music and short remix so there are often 30 tracks at the same time or more.
Correct latency (useful for recording live at noon)
GETTING STARTED
Easy Installation
Setup output audio and rglage master and headphone unusual.
Incompatibility more or less, let's say I do not use in Sonar rglage prconis by Cakewalk for this card, which is also the one recommended by Echo Audio. Otherwise, I can not rgler my latency as I wish. In manual mode so I rule tracks qd my project is too "big" to lower the latency and to register properly. My config is a bit light so it's not a problem ncessairement card but more power from my PC.
Concise manual, advice and forums can be used for children under the rods particulire output connectors.
OVERALL OPINION
8 months of intensive use
I tested two other models before
I like its performance, sound clarity and PCI ct / rack (I do not like the USB)
I like the least connection and headphone jack mono when I go out from Sonar for example (though the output is from a reader STREO Winamp style) I go through the blow out of the monitors in order to be stro
It is the least of this card, you need a connection particulire out to the monitors (a double-jack-mono/double-RCA cable) to exit from Sonar in Stereo (or other) and two mono jacks to the monitor for Winamp because it uses two output paths DIFFERENT depending on the signal.
I explain: 1 & 2 for winamp and 3 & 4 to Sonar or 4 output jack derrire the box connect the monitors to get sound without using the routing and unplug and reconnect constantly moves from one derrire qd a soft one another. So you have to play with the volume because the monitors also work for the master output (1 & 2) but not the other (3 & 4) There is also the solution to mix small table between the rack and the speakers.
The cable does it score only 10 euros more in the end, but given the feedback, ease of use one hand and slap permanent sound for the price each use the other hand, is a worthwhile.
This time, it is not really CHRE and devilishly effective.
A choice I would do so without hsiter!
To get an ide sound I recommend cost of securities that are working well (mixing clear and dynamic, compared with a conventional drive or another card, I still can not for the price !)
if I have some personal work for the curious
https://soundcloud.com/search?q [fulltext] = regenerated