Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Rupert Neve Designs Portico 5032 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Rupert Neve Designs Portico 5032
Images
1/38
Rupert Neve Designs Portico 5032
Bubbagump Bubbagump
Published on 03/25/11 at 16:36

It is described in the notice parfaintement precedent.
The quality is there. The action of potentimetres fresh and accurate.

I heard criticism of the PSU SEPARATE which seem based more on a priori that the objective criteria: it is not a standard PSU to 20 euros, Alimi decoupage made progress now (see the amps PA) and I trust Mr Neve does not cock up their aircraft with a power supply improvement.

UTILIZATION


OKIDOK, a band would be most welcome chui agree. But it would be more expensive when they're happening.
are clik and clok when encleche a switch, but this is due to the absence of Condesa coupling on signal path which is quite a good thing.

SOUND QUALITY


I really like the preamp. There is a presence, a sharpness, a "hand in your face" without harshness, however.
Extended bass, nice on the bass.
I do not use the slik ever: in fact, once the track in the mix, or I do not hear (ouuuh!) Or AC seems a hair less.

The EQ I like less. this is really a matter of taste. The highshelv is 8 ou16K but I always find myself stuck, shot at 12K soundcraft consoles such, I find it natural. I do not get down I want playing on the shelve and a wicked tight hollow to 100 or 200: AC is more massive than firm, not my thing. Please note, the Q is tight (!) Should not hesitate to open wide the width of the band lyrics corrections.
But it's really subjective, this EQ is a very high level, and a character said: 1 or 2 dB correction range.

OVERALL OPINION


2 years of use.

Impeccable machine, but with hindsight I would have taken completely different thing, as AMS 1073.