All user reviews for the Pioneer DJM-600

Mixer with digital effects of good qualities I advise the eco set to 7 is the top, but it's not the best.

UTILIZATION

This table is a marvel of Japanese technology for a faster style of mix in the movements of hands, but right now it vintage!

SOUNDS

For the Son does not push in the red with a sound system if it breaks the ears adjust the master A 5, and do not increase too, with adjustable table is very responsive, but it is not good ecstasy since I tested a vestax pmc500 I said that the pioneer is a bit of stew

OVERALL OPINION

I have been using with my 2003 technics is a very good restaurant to learn the mix

See manufacturer's website.

UTILIZATION

The configuration is relatively simple for you may have used tables mix, otherwise the instructions are clear enough to make up for any query. All the usual functions are easily accessibles.Pour me I had no problem handling.

SOUNDS

I did not feel out of breath, and the sound is very good even if it is individual (the bass is less noticeable than on other models) and équalizeur from rising up to 12 db, but very effective cut.

OVERALL OPINION

1 month

Look very nice, fairly long course of faders, in fact I like everything in the mixer (except the lack of bass).

I worked with the Power (yes, it does not younger) and Berhinger.

Excellent value for money (I got it new for less than € 900) and I think I would do the same choice again. However, I will wait to see what it gives to use and if the problem I will give an opinion.

Personal I had no prolem its the contrary I have a good quality sound ...
Remarc ...
As against this, see that it's not a mixer for the scratch ...
Really disappointed on this point ...

UTILIZATION

The cross is very long, despite some settings that can still not great ...
As well as it's been long since I touch are not from the home studio ... I thought why not take a good break beats and have fun this ...
After half an hour, big black mark on my fingers ...

SOUNDS

That's why he is the silver (which leaves no trace on the fingers) ct a joke for what they do not understand!
Designed for the club or clubs but not a scratch intesa ...

OVERALL OPINION

Is it possible to accentuate the sharpness of the cut?

Mixer Rack, both in the original 19 inches against the price brackets ... in the 50 but hey when achte a table of this award, we know what to expect!
I will not remember the number of lanes, I do not think there have DIFFERENT MODELS of the DJM 600 lol

The effects are trs well, even great! including the transformation of the voice with the micro Pitch effect, to bring a little atmosphere in the room!
However, when the treble pots, mid and low focus, there is a tendency to have too much treble, but it also dpend music.

UTILIZATION

Use could not be more simple and enjoyable, especially for mix electro / hard or faders are requested trs ... trs flexible.

with respect to the manual, you must have a vocabulary of sound but still with the rflexion ...

SOUNDS

So the great sound! before j'tais with BST Activ 206, and the sound changed dramatically! but what incredible sharpness c ... it is also necessary for the amplifier and sound processor that go .. but frankly hat.

on his headphone, trs good you just daugmenter Gain for more sound in the headphones ... everyone apparently did not understand!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it for 7 months no problem!
I love everything about this mixer but two small points ...
- The talk-over is not automatic
- A bit too sharp but ca default is easily RULES

quality price ratio ... honnte Pioneer trs is expensive and will always be expensive, but compared to Numark, Gemini, ... y'as no photo!

later, the CDJ j'achte! without hsitations

Hello everyone well I'll speak to beginners who may not understand all the baths "pro"

in a few sentences the djm 600:

is a very good mixer (admittedly very expensive) but we go well lol not really effect his Alucine her and very easy to use and really makes it a very good sound quality! It can record a part of music for 8 sec ...
to start with the cross must be connected with the table of platinum cd pioneer. output sound through the headphones is really good and powerful! in short it really nice and easy to use too need the manual except for the table really approfondire

So its a pretty high price its the least of the table

effects stylish 12 or 13 in total with the settings every time we made ourselves to change the pace! BPM counter and reliable. er me on mine I have no breath of all cons but I confess when it goes red c true that it's hard to get a quality worthy of Pioneer!
So a system requirements is to have a real amp and an equalizer behind!

the cross are flexible there's no problem!
in short it is a wonder I have for three weeks and really I do not regret the 800 € (new)

UTILIZATION

Gfbf

SOUNDS

Gfb

OVERALL OPINION

Gbf

- Is the rack? Yes
- How many lanes, bus attendant, departures, returns ...)? 4 + 1 master tracks
- What is the type of connectors (RCA, Jack, XLR ...)? RCA, XLR and Jack
- The parametric equalizer is it? Not
- The effects section is it integrated? ... Yes

UTILIZATION

The general configuration-is it simple? yes very easy
- The usual functions are they easily accessible? yes
- The manual is clear and sufficient? ... not read but it is not used unless you want to push down capabilities

SOUNDS

- Introduced she breath? I is not heard in person
- The equalizer is effective? ... very effective

OVERALL OPINION

- How long have you use it? I was not but I have THE USER
- What is so special that you like most and least?
Most:
Design
effects
Dual BPM Counter
the button effects, cool to the touch but hey it's not something super important, but the feel good ^ ^
Faders, solid and well slide
the specific equalizers
the potentiometer
The selection effects that are indicated on the table in contrast to the DJX 700

The -:
Price
Potentiometers that are not made of rubber (I'm looking a little silly Little Miss)

- Have you tried many other models before buying it? I have not but I tried the DJM 800 / Synq SMX-2 / Behringer DJX 700
- How would you rate the quality / price? Exellent dommae that the price is a bit Exess
- With experience, you do again this choice? ...
If I spend two turntables + Vinyl CD I would take not much to the table a bit and have 800 + but I would have no choice, this table is an exellent choice but good because I'm just on CD for the moment I m orient more on the DJM 400

DJM600

UTILIZATION

PIONEER's simply a near-perfect ergonomics, everything is at hand, and the effects do not need 36-key combinations or menu to be adjusted to live.

by lctronique is against the mdiocre, as the indoor lowcost. Of breath, hum, noise switching, transfer of sound in the bus even though everything is 0 .... poor control of common mode filtering ... as well as the effect would have multi MRIT in some self SERIES on power.
SERIES condos in the audio are chemical, hello phase shift, the raisin bread are X7R, bad audio on the cause of the piezo effect, in short, the economy everywhere, yet it sold quite expensive, you pay the brand, once again from PIONEER.
it is on that kk that the DJ plays one night a boom or a background in their den on a hi-fi 50W, they will find a good (especially that there labeled Pioneer above), on the other hand in studio, radio or ds that the search of his claret with a lot of watts, is a drip pan. Fortunately, in the nightclub noise is such that a default cover.

you can not use the effects and sampler independently.

another point of criticism is the microphone 2, which requires a PHONO monopolize. Not practical in a battle with MC:
starts and use the forces in place the CD 1 and 2, and TD 3 and 4, except that the auxiliary microphone can be assigned that channel 4! (I have a Denon, and when you taste from the matrix, it is difficult with other ....).

SOUNDS

the console is virtually transparent, the sound is a little color but not too much. It's not dsagrable, but lack of dynamics.
The equalizer that climb 12 dB is nothing. the-26dB is a little lightweight when it made war the numbers, but in the end it's enough, I have never shown a sense "crap has not cut enough."
Besides the breath I think too much, I think without compressor derrire we not do much, if not peter amps.
good range of output, ideal for modulating compressors to give his "club", the inconvnient is that all the time in the red and has not let too many reserve (especially for effects).
multi effect Intgr is good quality.

I put a 6 which is just, the compartment or the DENON ECLER DJ to stay in range, the DJM 600 is more than average.
Denon course there are circuits ANALOG DEVICES, BURR BROWN, TEXAS, PANASONIC ..... which is not the case that the PIONEER taking low-end or waffers virtually obsolete.

OVERALL OPINION

the notice is a mixed console trs average, which catches all is the use and strong because it must be said ergonomics is perfect (both available in the use effects), and chassis rigidity gives any evidence.

console perfect bar and club, but avoid the studio if you search for perfection.
for observing a RELOOP RMX40 I not ashamed to say that is better RELOOP Designed (apart from the fact that my taste is a little behind the Pioneer).

what I owned before (and always for sure):

- OMNITRONIC PM 640 (best quality price, my first mixer, it lasts 7 years!).
- BEHRINGER DJX 700 (my biggest mistake).
- CHESLEY Equinox (the box, though).
- Denon DNX 1500 (trs sound good, but I can almost unlimited deprecated for the live mix).

given the fact that I use (mix live) I would do this choice, or wait a little longer to see if the RELOOP go the distance (which seems to be the case), since half the price of a DJM600 can be a good deal.
I would do this also because the choice is easy and resale without losing too much money.

The characteristics and performance are average (see below and in the other post on the subject of the components)

UTILIZATION

The setup is nice, it's the highlight of the console except some points carément unacceptable.
In the super ago: Ergonomics, possibilities and effects commands, bpm double if necessary (it can work with CDJ 100 that are inexpensive and well used), relative strength, and fader operation and ease of crosfader dedicated controls the position and size of controls, ease of mix and opportunities, working comfort, the headphones and controls PFL, the meters that help clear the fluid mix well ... I certainly forget
In the medium means there are: the master output fader and we can hang straight (Grr, it m'arive almost every evening ...), which is not very precise. The low number of entries online.
In the bad: second mic unusable (not practice it requires cutting a stereo channel, its pathetic ...), not cross main mic and trimmings limited active crossfader on two channels at once what does not really a four-way effect. This last point is really annoying 2cd + configuration interface two channels, we all have a computer in today. For the last CD input for a misplaced extension microphone or another (it is more practical on a DJM 400)

SOUNDS

Not so transparent breath.
EQ well
Acceptable sound at medium volume, but once you turn up the sound becomes dry and poor draft. We joined forces with an external EQ, it is sometimes confused with a big sound system. If the sound is low-end, do not have ears hard. With good sound that goes into working a little overboard. What I say is related to the extent it is still not his "bottom line" is still above average. Still, for example, DENON DNX 500 Genre I like better and seems more "musical" (I tested blind EQ 0). Sound from the microphone means and the second micro carément below the average ... Help!
To suggest a function as void to be done. I understand why I saw some DJ unplug them to plug their main mike HF example for a presentation. But hey, this is not the main function of a DJ table ...

OVERALL OPINION

What I like most about it is the use and overall capabilities. Adapting to different styles make it a platform universally appreciated (see above). For my part, CDJ100S use with Denon 4500 and things are going well. The caretaking work reliably and efficiently is limited and this is my occasional use. About 1000 Euros plus two Mix cdj 100, interface board and fly Denon. (Not counting the computer) ...
I am extremely disappointed cons of other points that I find unworthy of a camera in this class (see above). Smooth the mix is ​​good but when it is necessary to facilitate or simply to be heard is not great sometimes annoying (see various issues of micro and I do not talk over you ...)... Anyway, this function is disturbing, and requires little concentration: we happen to another table better equipped in this respect. Using open mic permanently requires the use of a very good style Shure microphone. The weight and handling of the hose will not fail to kill very quickly input jack on the front.
Value for money carément exaggerated hand, there has seen the price of ads. They are often (very) old and all are sold "as new". At 500 euros opportunity, if we compare with a DJM700 for little more, the sound is better and the device is guaranteed. Between 300 and 400 seems a more acceptable price.
on the other hand, its universality that the store "local" know them and can fix or renovate for low prices. A council, think about ventilation Authorities closed, it heats a lot! Given the state of those sent in for repair, I think it must improve its reliability over time ...
Tried other brands? Yes, some (see my other post). With the experience: there's more in other brands, (there is also much worse) you win the microphones and sound, but you lose the starts, or effects, or both ...
At Pioneer, the 800 seems much better and there are 4 starts but it will be still some way off given the price of nine. The 700 remains as competitive with better sound and some small ergonomic flaws corrected.
I've tested and used more (DJM600) many were bad ... . It is nevertheless a good tool.
on the other hand for a first purchase or for the mobile disco, I strongly recommend. Better to buy an equivalent budjet Denon nine if we use some effects (DNX 1100 or 500) or DJM 400 second-hand property in two ways, offers more options and configurations with a reduced size. Repeat this choice? No, I changed to a 400 eventually.

connection: we dream, not even a master XLR, so big loss in level and quality, and already it's not the sound ca ... Although its role is not used to making speeches, the microphones to allow designated

UTILIZATION

certainly well setup, functions of the simplest, I do not even have the manual.

SOUNDS

transparent console? but then not so! of breath? not had time to try and do not want

EQ? no fishing

OVERALL OPINION

I used it one evening, I ordered a vestax pmc280 who had not arrived so I got to pay the 600. I had only read some contradictory comments on the consoles pioneer, but then the AC has exceeded everything I could imagine.
level of power is the catastrophe. Gain background, I am sometimes just to 0dB. The diodes are ok, but honest, put a diode to 1 db is tellment useless. La presion tell me it does. bin and before thinking about the diode, should consider the console. The effects are generally pretty easy to use as the table that is very well organized, except the master Knob stuck to the line 4. Thank you!
is the sound of anything. Even my old AudioPhony done the same! and then I'm good so that FCR not tell me it's my system.

I do not understand how one can love this table, especially for what it costs! ... except for ergonomics / effects in a pinch.

anecdote: I make my microphone talkover engaged. I no longer think. I start the evening off microphone. Stress and pregnancy: everything thoroughly, I leave nothing. qq minutes after I talk over the pops and AC "Pete" (well as a 600). I see no point in this damned talkover which is supposed to act only when using the microphone! That would mean that every time they are used, there was a big flop musical. really great. Normally, it acts intelligently but must believe not.

The mixer is not rackable without modifications. The main inputs are RCA, and outputs are RCA and XLR. It has analog connections and 4 channels, each with 2 inputs for phono and line. The eq is not parametric and simply has separate knobs for bass, mid, and treble. There is an integrated effects section, but it does not support automation. Synchronization is not supported on this model.

UTILIZATION

Functions are very easily accessible, and great fun to use once the user is accustomed to the unit. Install is very easy, and connection is straightforward. The manual is clear and does not leave out any important information about running the mixer.

SOUNDS

The sound quality is perfect without generating hiss or distortion. The sound of the mixer and effects are great, although sound a little dated now that we are in 2010. EQ's are great and still function very well after all these years.

OVERALL OPINION

The thing I like most about this mixer is the reliability, layout and use, and standardization. In clubs, this mixer or an updated version of this mixer is pretty much all you will see, so as a DJ, it makes it easier to play in strange places when you are familiar with the equipment. The mixer can be purchased for a relatively small amount of money as new models and updates have since been released. The sound is precise and perfect, with the only wear and tear on the mixer in my experience being the faders wearing out after many years of normal use (or a few years of rough use). Faders are inexpensive to replace and hardly a detractor as a purchase point. Before I had this mixer, I owned Numark mixers, which were good for starters, but as I became more experienced I wanted more options as well as a more professional feel. Moving up to this mixer was ideal because it did not involve a large financial investment, but the benefits were a large step up from the previously used Numark Models.

The features are amazing, I don't think they could have included much more. However, Being able to have more than one sample would have been nice, or being able to assign your sample to a channel and then be able to adjust the EQ on it......

Price paid

$850 usd

UTILIZATION

The interface is very easy to use and quick to pick up. The manual explains most things however, this is not for a begainner

The DJM600 is amazingly robust, I have used it manytimes and have not had any problems.

SOUNDS

The sound is quite decent, however, a broaded EQ would have been nice.

OVERALL OPINION

Overall I love this machine. I would reccommend it to any Serious DJ.... It is also good for use in Clubs or at Gigs.......

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: Unknown (January 1-, 2003)

IT FEATURES EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO PRODUCE QUALITY MIXES.3 OPTIONS ON THE CROSS FADER CURVE WHICH IS GREAT FOR SCRATCHING.AND THE SAMPLING AND RECORDING FEATURES ARE SIMPLE TO USE TO.

Price paid

£650

UTILIZATION

THIS IS AN EASY MIXER TO MASTER,YOU DONT REALLY NEED TO READ UP ON HOW TO USE ALL THE FEATURES AND SAMPLES,SIMPLY PLUG AND PLAY!THE SPLIT CUE IS EXCELLENT,IT ACTUALLY SPLITS LEFT AND RIGHT INPUT AS IT SHOULD DO IN EACH EAR OF THE HEADPHONES,NOT LIKE THE DJM300 WHERE IT MIXES BOTH INPUTS IN BOTH EARS.THE ONLY DOWNSIDE TO THIS MIXER IS WHERE THEY HAVE PUT THE HEADPHONE SOCKET,IT DOES GET IN THE WAY SOMETIMES AND IS PRONE TO YOU KNOCKING IT,IN MY OPPINION IT SHOUD HAVE BEEN MOUNTED ON THE VERY FRONT AND NOT COMING OUT THE TOP OF THE MIXER,WHERE ALL THE NOBS ARE.

THIS FEELS AND LOOKS LIKE A QUALITY MIXER.SO FAR IVE HAD NO TROUBLES AND IVE NOT HEARD OF ANY TROUBLES YET ON THIS MODEL.MOST OF THE CLUBS IVE PLAYED IN HAVE THIS MIXER,SO THAT ALONE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF.

SOUNDS

SOUND QUALITY IS GOOD,I FIND THE EQ VERY SENSATIVE,THE SMALLEST TWEAK ON ANY OF THE HIGHS MIDS OR LOWS MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

OVERALL OPINION

I LOVE THIS MIXER BECAUSE OF HOW IT LOOKS AND THE WOW FACTOR WHEN A FRIEND USES IT.UNLESS YOU HAVE A TOP OF THE RANGE ALLEN AND HEATH I DONT THINK YOU CAN BEAT THIS,ESPECIALLY IF YOU MIX HOUSE AND TRANCE.

Originally posted on FutureProducers.com
Posted by: jaypython (January 0-, 2004)