«  A mixer neither good nor bad. »

* All characteristics have already been mentioned so I will not repeat what has already been said.

UTILIZATION

* The use of this table is intuitive, all functions come to hand, it takes less than an hour to get used to.

* The manual is a reflection of the table, very simple (only 4 pages)

SOUNDS

* The console does not introduce breath, the sound is clean but not great.

* The EQ is average I think, especially in the media and the kills that lack precision.
When the box effects, it is easily configurable (volume, time, sync) but has too many unnecessary effects.

OVERALL OPINION

* I use it for more than a year

* The pros:-Belle esthéthique, manufacturing clean
Ideal for medium-budget
-Some good effects
The -:-EQ very very average
-Too many unnecessary effects
-Not strong enough
-Fader buttons that flies right in the mix

* I have tested other like DJM 600, 700 and 800. A SYNQ SMX-3, a ecler EVO5 and the little sister of the rmx-40, the rmx-30.

* The price / quality ratio is considered difficult because the table does not stand up stroke time

* No, I would do not have that choice, even if the table is not bad for me it lacks robustness. I think it should be facilitators "push hard" but not the Dj