Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Yamaha MG16/4 reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Yamaha MG16/4
Images
1/178
Yamaha MG16/4

Analog Mixer from Yamaha belonging to the MG series

Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
Alkyos Alkyos
Published on 11/11/06 at 09:04
Value For Money : Excellent
- Is the rack?
Absolutely, it comes with COTS rack, just the dvisser and the reverse, the round is played.

- How many ways, auxiliaries and dparts
16 Tracks including 4 Stros.
10 Between Pramp XRL Jack or Jack in the rest.
2 For
Group 1 Stro.
1 Master Stro
1 RCA Direct recording
1 headphone.

- The qualiseur paramtrique is it?
3-Band EQ Low Mdium Egue.

- The effects section is it intgre?
No, they are on 16 / 4 FX

UTILIZATION

- The configuration gnrale Is it easy?
Nothing could be simpler

- The usual functions are they easily accessible?
The buttons are sized and impcables enough space to work without any drgler.

- The manual is clear and sufficient?
Not have to open it, so I know.

SOUNDS

- The console is transparent?
I compared it with a Mackie Onyx 1220, the current REFERENCE, my Yamaha is a little less dynamic but the sound is right, yamaha lgre color in a very powerful high mdium but nothing serious, the piano sounds is a bit obvious.
In all cases for 230 less than the Mackie's report quality price is better.

- Introduced she breath?
Then I stayed on my ass for that price, in home studio with Diva 18 in monitor speakers you have to push the wafer and the master 15 Db to begin hearing a little breath, and I do not know anyone who works this way ...
For the price again Yamaha is super strong.

- The qualiseur is it effective?
Good for the cons is not amrique, disont for sounds numriques rights of peasants screaming synths last ca the fact, if you have a Gibson Les Paul from 1970 to craquotte or frisote or Berhinger vocal mic, it will be the lightweight. (yes there are still people who buy Berhinger ...)
Good to be said that even if I RPET for the price is nickel.

OVERALL OPINION

- What is the particular feature you like best and least?
Report quality + price
+ The right
+ Lack of breath
+ Dynamics
+ Ergonomics
+ The pramps not bad for the price
+ The complete routing
+ The quality of the faders
+ The look
- The Equal somewhat lightweight
- No switch for each mic / line (AC banana too when you plug in a synth XLR same gains 0)

- Have you tried many other models before acqurir?
With my mtier rgisseur sound of running I worked on all the consoles out there, from the smallest Soundcraft Spirit trs poo the largest numrique that costs the price of one house saint tropez, Euphonix kills serious example.
I had a studio in my Allen & Heath GL 2200 / 424 that I sold to tear the eye problem room in my home stud.

- How do you report qualitprix?
I bought this little yamaha while waiting for funds for a DM1000 or O2R V2 96.
For intrim, even if it s'ternise, this little MG 16 / 4 wide enough for me with a smile and more.
Frankly it is tightened to a Nickel budjet serious sound pro, I pse my words, "pro" for a price of beginners amateur.

- With the exprience, you do again this choice?
I would do without this choice hsiter, I encourage low budjets looking for good stuff even in the prods df not hsiter not one second.
Fawn is not any RVer, Yamaha is a big REFERENCE, it's hard to crash it with this brand.

PS: I do not recommend to add the 100 for the FX version, by the against the effects are super nazes ... for the live band in the limit dpanage let's say, but then the studio m rve not me.