View other reviews for this product:
Y^tek
Published on 06/11/04 at 00:35
Installation? good, say it does not look like a conventional ... a black> uninstall not worthy of the name ...
As far as the first boot, no problem, the configuraiton is clear and everything went well.
Cot manual ... bah mieu worth talking about because the online help manuals are not really good (despite efforts to trying to provide a French version.)
So in light of these points the final score is not the best. at the same time, my computer is mtier then install .... bp >>> 8 / 10
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I use fruity on a laptop: Dell Inspiron 4000, PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 20 GB HD 4200tpm, audio card m-audio quattro (4E / S) a MK-225C MIDI keyboard controller and a UC-16 ...
I used to live with a lot of effect (about 20 between the original ones and some VSTe) and samples (roughly 30/40 for 30mins). The top few VSTi but live in a big rarr.
latency between 2 and 5 ms, bug on the information processor, but otherwise, given the pc I use one can say that it is gnial, I have no problem in performance rel. Comparing a Reason, my config exploded before I could finish my session live .... na, trs a note for this part!
OVERALL OPINION
The ergonomics of the software is good, I gave all beginners (on v2.72) a little time because there are many screen view, and APRS over several years, I 'in discovering every day.
This app is gnial, the quality of sound output just be good but needs to pursue this particular point, it is good samples, good rglage on eq and at least two exits spar es on the greasy tek to avoid food that kicks do the whole dynamic.
Frankly, APRS trying to change for Reason (1, 2 and 2.5), Storm (sick) and Orion, I must say that is really fruity and full trs can do anything if we give ourselves the means to do!
The price is $ 150 plus ultra aggressive for such a variety ... I care!
As far as the first boot, no problem, the configuraiton is clear and everything went well.
Cot manual ... bah mieu worth talking about because the online help manuals are not really good (despite efforts to trying to provide a French version.)
So in light of these points the final score is not the best. at the same time, my computer is mtier then install .... bp >>> 8 / 10
SUITABILITY/PERFORMANCE
I use fruity on a laptop: Dell Inspiron 4000, PIII 850MHz, 384MB RAM, 20 GB HD 4200tpm, audio card m-audio quattro (4E / S) a MK-225C MIDI keyboard controller and a UC-16 ...
I used to live with a lot of effect (about 20 between the original ones and some VSTe) and samples (roughly 30/40 for 30mins). The top few VSTi but live in a big rarr.
latency between 2 and 5 ms, bug on the information processor, but otherwise, given the pc I use one can say that it is gnial, I have no problem in performance rel. Comparing a Reason, my config exploded before I could finish my session live .... na, trs a note for this part!
OVERALL OPINION
The ergonomics of the software is good, I gave all beginners (on v2.72) a little time because there are many screen view, and APRS over several years, I 'in discovering every day.
This app is gnial, the quality of sound output just be good but needs to pursue this particular point, it is good samples, good rglage on eq and at least two exits spar es on the greasy tek to avoid food that kicks do the whole dynamic.
Frankly, APRS trying to change for Reason (1, 2 and 2.5), Storm (sick) and Orion, I must say that is really fruity and full trs can do anything if we give ourselves the means to do!
The price is $ 150 plus ultra aggressive for such a variety ... I care!