Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Fender Telecoustic [2000-2005] reviews
Add this product to
  • My former gear
  • My current gear
  • My wishlist
Fender Telecoustic [2000-2005]
Images
1/122
Fender Telecoustic [2000-2005]
Price engine
Classified Ads
Forums
YanLowFreq YanLowFreq
Published on 11/06/03 at 04:59
Made in China = zero. Fender ... should not be fooled by appearances, even Leonard de Vinci was caca.
The qual. is that three bands (not 4), but there is a contour DEFINITIONS. Dernire This is not breathtaking, even insignificant.

Also note the hole in table (I forget the name ... the event?) Is elliptical, not round, making it difficult or impossible to use a mute.
Rope bindings are weak on the rack, the plastic bitonios break very easy if you do not take it like a dentist. Finally, the composite body, pouerk.

Apart from the brief look and handle, this guitar is not for her.

UTILIZATION

The handle is quite enjoyable for a regular at the guitar maker. CHAC at agu is good for an electric guitar: a solo the 15 box is made without problem.

A BIG HUGE dtail all of the same: the quilibrage of the guitar is dsastreux, dplorable, no, it wound up playing since the head is heavier than the body. Loose balance when the handle between two pieces guitar gets "five hours" ...

To the right sound, you can always seek, y 'no.

SOUNDS

Sound: pouerk pouerk pouerk. But o is the good sound of wood that is sought on an electro-acoustic??

Suitable for those who seeks his "Ultrabright" y 'a?

I put one go, because there is much sound comes out of this thing.

OVERALL OPINION

Guitar stew. Just bursting on scne good for the show.

Good things: the look, price = 2 points.
Ngatifs Points: everything else.