Log in
Log in

or
Create an account

or
< All Audix VX10 reviews
LeBonzAie LeBonzAie

«  Ravi! This is not a Neuman and yet ... »

Published on 03/22/12 at 15:44
For singing, the spoken voice live and / or outside the studio for recordings. Instruments as though I have not done much testing on this side except the guitar. The advantages of capacitors (accuracy, natural) without the drawbacks (sensitivity to sound, proximity effect, sensitivity to handling noise. What happiness for my own use after all!

OVERALL OPINION

I use it mainly for my part voices speaking in private ... It is a good way to get the best possible sound by extracting the bad acoustics of untreated parts. After the remote microwave source should ideally remain between 10 to 25 cm (depending on the acoustics) so that it keeps the best grain possible without coloring. For recording the most remote, I'd prefer the hypercardio for this use. The sound is very natural shine without the kms105. Concerning repisse, I tried it on a song with playback at 80 cm back to the monitors and I was surprised that no feedback. A replay, the tape was indeed instrumental feeble. The polarity is effective cardio. Not bad at all for the scene I reckon if the singer is quite disciplined and do not troll around wildly screaming. Sounds gripping is well mitigated. Congratulations guys short of Audix. My only regret except the relative proximity of use is that it takes a little pop noise but now I'm nitpicking. It's just related to my personal use: voice recording alone. For the scene do not worry it's safe on this side. A product not sufficiently known in our region. Hard to get out of "references" in effect ... Try to convince yourself.