View other reviews for this product:
tweak
Published on 02/21/08 at 16:47
10 for MIDI when we retouve leaving only the Xone 92 2 times more expensive option. It was very convenient for me and I could still use more in the synchronization of the drum machine and all my order from nuo.
I also put 10 for the cross p'tain missing just a little flexibility, but some people like that it resists all a little bit. It depends on the tastes and colors.
10 for EQ and gain.
10 for the scalability of the product. Can be mounted above the cross ethernal HAK360 (that rivals all the same with that of the rane TTM56) and for riders who can win the gain.
UTILIZATION
The manual is good but damn if I mention a anner not mistaken. From memory it is said that in setting cut to adjust finely the cutoff point of the cross is the cross innactif home. Quietly I have not touched this setting for at least a year because he was advised to let off on a cross as ethernal is not mounted. Except that this setting works perfectly even with the original cross.
I ask a lot but can be a kill switch like the bass was present for the mid and treble ca would have been terrible for a creative point of view and the table would have been completely hybrid (mix, scratch and components with the pm)
Personally I used to use 3 and also with MixVibes Pro 6. It works perfectly but now I go to the TTM57 SL because I want to cross an even more flexible (I could have a ethernal) but I also want a dedicated table with a scratch and scratch for ergonomics with controls directly and not through the computer keyboard. The thing that I will miss is the MIDI. (To AC remains the possibility of using a control pad and it's good luck I need one)
Seen by a meter would have been better and the screen around the cross is a bit fragile (although I have many, many scratched and the screen is part of that 2cm ², while the cross was no sign of fatigue; I've also seen a Pioneer DJM909 completely polished by the finger of a scratcher so the nuo comes out again not too bad.)
-1 For all of the same screen.
SOUNDS
Great sound
gain
Warm and pleasant
No saturation, no distortion
Music
Same for EQ
The cut is fine to fine scratch
RAS for sound what is ultimately most important.
OVERALL OPINION
I am very happy with my nuo. It all:
MIDI (you can get away with soft and with a DJ on a laptop and that's enough)
of which kill and musical EQ
Balanced outputs
if it is not enough gain can be added riders to win 6dB
A send and return effects is by pre or post fader
The headphone and Cue mix
2 headphone jacks
A cross of thunder, strong (2 years of scratch and it has not moved, it is still soft, I had to blow guns once and for all it's form)
There is a low line input that helped me out often to get a synth on the table.
there are plenty of gain and a beautiful sound and no audible breath reading. A slight breath but if one is to knock on the master and the amp and there is no light read but it is especially not a realistic condition of use.
I gladly referrer this purchase, rappport money is very good, it's been two years since I use it, I tested Numark Pro SM 1 2 3 DXM06 and 09, Pioneer DJM 400, 800, 707 and 909, Rodec , amix, gemini, smack ecler 40, nuo 2, 3, 4 and HAK360, ttm56.
I go to the TTM57SL because I do not need 4 channels and I want a special table and the best in its field. I took the nuo 4 knowing that for € 750 2 years ago was the best hybrid (mix, scratch and noon) and without taking risks without compromising on features and quality until they really find my way.
I also put 10 for the cross p'tain missing just a little flexibility, but some people like that it resists all a little bit. It depends on the tastes and colors.
10 for EQ and gain.
10 for the scalability of the product. Can be mounted above the cross ethernal HAK360 (that rivals all the same with that of the rane TTM56) and for riders who can win the gain.
UTILIZATION
The manual is good but damn if I mention a anner not mistaken. From memory it is said that in setting cut to adjust finely the cutoff point of the cross is the cross innactif home. Quietly I have not touched this setting for at least a year because he was advised to let off on a cross as ethernal is not mounted. Except that this setting works perfectly even with the original cross.
I ask a lot but can be a kill switch like the bass was present for the mid and treble ca would have been terrible for a creative point of view and the table would have been completely hybrid (mix, scratch and components with the pm)
Personally I used to use 3 and also with MixVibes Pro 6. It works perfectly but now I go to the TTM57 SL because I want to cross an even more flexible (I could have a ethernal) but I also want a dedicated table with a scratch and scratch for ergonomics with controls directly and not through the computer keyboard. The thing that I will miss is the MIDI. (To AC remains the possibility of using a control pad and it's good luck I need one)
Seen by a meter would have been better and the screen around the cross is a bit fragile (although I have many, many scratched and the screen is part of that 2cm ², while the cross was no sign of fatigue; I've also seen a Pioneer DJM909 completely polished by the finger of a scratcher so the nuo comes out again not too bad.)
-1 For all of the same screen.
SOUNDS
Great sound
gain
Warm and pleasant
No saturation, no distortion
Music
Same for EQ
The cut is fine to fine scratch
RAS for sound what is ultimately most important.
OVERALL OPINION
I am very happy with my nuo. It all:
MIDI (you can get away with soft and with a DJ on a laptop and that's enough)
of which kill and musical EQ
Balanced outputs
if it is not enough gain can be added riders to win 6dB
A send and return effects is by pre or post fader
The headphone and Cue mix
2 headphone jacks
A cross of thunder, strong (2 years of scratch and it has not moved, it is still soft, I had to blow guns once and for all it's form)
There is a low line input that helped me out often to get a synth on the table.
there are plenty of gain and a beautiful sound and no audible breath reading. A slight breath but if one is to knock on the master and the amp and there is no light read but it is especially not a realistic condition of use.
I gladly referrer this purchase, rappport money is very good, it's been two years since I use it, I tested Numark Pro SM 1 2 3 DXM06 and 09, Pioneer DJM 400, 800, 707 and 909, Rodec , amix, gemini, smack ecler 40, nuo 2, 3, 4 and HAK360, ttm56.
I go to the TTM57SL because I do not need 4 channels and I want a special table and the best in its field. I took the nuo 4 knowing that for € 750 2 years ago was the best hybrid (mix, scratch and noon) and without taking risks without compromising on features and quality until they really find my way.