Houston classified ad
Alerte nouvelle annonceImages
Reviews
5.0/5(5 reviews)
80 %
Write a user review
OlafGood product
Published on 01/08/14 at 02:11 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I no longer use it for 2 years, but I'm me served for more than 10 years.
Fully compatible with Cubase and Nuendo.
Very good product, faders are now a little tired but it still works.
Fully compatible with Cubase and Nuendo.
Very good product, faders are now a little tired but it still works.
00
»
ardierEffective
Published on 12/31/13 at 07:53 (This content has been automatically translated from French)I used 2 years
to summarize what is the ultimate control surface for Cubase, but I sold it for a single reason ... instead ... and I do not like the hui protocol and constraints at display
I have since replaced by p1 nektar panorama which is more compact but unfortunately that did not motorized fader.
to summarize what is the ultimate control surface for Cubase, but I sold it for a single reason ... instead ... and I do not like the hui protocol and constraints at display
I have since replaced by p1 nektar panorama which is more compact but unfortunately that did not motorized fader.
01
»
youmdesPublished on 03/11/03 at 07:21 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
Purchased in June 2002,
I find it gnial, easy and intuitive ACCS.
The engine and the wheel transportation make it a quick rev to dplacer or mix Cubase (or Nuendo ...).
The pav numrique can freely assign functions that are DSIR (call from any window, save, quantify ...).
The knobs are endless also very practical for everything from pan automation, rglage EQ, etc ... but less convenient for "large" virtual synths because you end up with an impressive number of pages diffrent (24 for PPG Wave 2 and 19 for the Pro53) so if there was a small rglage do, the mouse is still welcome.
The price remains nanmoins a bit expensive for a "simple" tlcommande which merely replaces the job of...…
I find it gnial, easy and intuitive ACCS.
The engine and the wheel transportation make it a quick rev to dplacer or mix Cubase (or Nuendo ...).
The pav numrique can freely assign functions that are DSIR (call from any window, save, quantify ...).
The knobs are endless also very practical for everything from pan automation, rglage EQ, etc ... but less convenient for "large" virtual synths because you end up with an impressive number of pages diffrent (24 for PPG Wave 2 and 19 for the Pro53) so if there was a small rglage do, the mouse is still welcome.
The price remains nanmoins a bit expensive for a "simple" tlcommande which merely replaces the job of...…
Read more
Purchased in June 2002,
I find it gnial, easy and intuitive ACCS.
The engine and the wheel transportation make it a quick rev to dplacer or mix Cubase (or Nuendo ...).
The pav numrique can freely assign functions that are DSIR (call from any window, save, quantify ...).
The knobs are endless also very practical for everything from pan automation, rglage EQ, etc ... but less convenient for "large" virtual synths because you end up with an impressive number of pages diffrent (24 for PPG Wave 2 and 19 for the Pro53) so if there was a small rglage do, the mouse is still welcome.
The price remains nanmoins a bit expensive for a "simple" tlcommande which merely replaces the job of the field mouse ...
I find it gnial, easy and intuitive ACCS.
The engine and the wheel transportation make it a quick rev to dplacer or mix Cubase (or Nuendo ...).
The pav numrique can freely assign functions that are DSIR (call from any window, save, quantify ...).
The knobs are endless also very practical for everything from pan automation, rglage EQ, etc ... but less convenient for "large" virtual synths because you end up with an impressive number of pages diffrent (24 for PPG Wave 2 and 19 for the Pro53) so if there was a small rglage do, the mouse is still welcome.
The price remains nanmoins a bit expensive for a "simple" tlcommande which merely replaces the job of the field mouse ...
See less
10
»
Anonymous Published on 10/08/08 at 01:57 (This content has been automatically translated from French)
I use it since 2003 ...
what I like most is the stability of the 9 faders and control simple and prcis of all parameters of Cubase and Nuendo ect
Yes, I tried the Mackie Control, the bcf in 2000 and frankly I am more sensitive on the draw sheet houston everything is so simple and costal bte is really not his toy playskool
CHRE has just released her but now it can reach 600 euros for a OCCAZ
yes, recess
what I like most is the stability of the 9 faders and control simple and prcis of all parameters of Cubase and Nuendo ect
Yes, I tried the Mackie Control, the bcf in 2000 and frankly I am more sensitive on the draw sheet houston everything is so simple and costal bte is really not his toy playskool
CHRE has just released her but now it can reach 600 euros for a OCCAZ
yes, recess
01
»
Tech. sheet
- Manufacturer: Steinberg
- Model: Houston
- Category: Motorized MIDI Control Surfaces
- Added in our database on: 04/01/2002
We have no technical specifications for this product
but your help will be much welcomed
»
Other categories in MIDI Control Surfaces
Other names: houston