All user reviews for the Sennheiser HD 250 Linear II

I use this headset for years, and before I used a dad, the HD250 Linear.
I like the quality of restitution, it's my headphones Hifi of references. It is relatively neutral my ears, no surprsentes low, no acute surpousss, mediums intelligible, what more?
The comfort of cost? Oh, also it has.
The sound? Yes, also (though I pass a bunch of times over my seat with wheels)
The look? each judge, I find it difficult
The price? Not too expensive I think. Ears, it's important for those who love music, so as not mgoter. You can find more expensive and better, but the quality Is this better? However, with more expensive headphones look of blind and overboosted radio bandwidth in the low, ay in plthore for addicts look killer in town.

I tried and had other headphones in my life:
- When an old Koss j'tais teenager, something that must have weighed 25 kilos (well OK j'exagre a little bit) with its silent trs trs but enjoyable round. The last I could try koss taient not the same quality.
- The Sennheiser HD linear, first name. I t happy until that bad contacts make me look for a successor after more than ten years of loyal service. Only after purchasing the linear II that I look more prs bad contacts and everything back on their feet. Indestructible, whatever. This headset is always me.
- A Sony MDR V500 DJ, not given. Not bad at cost. Quite fragile, I have a headset with a speaker is no one jumps to cash volume. but especially in UNCOMFORTABLE possible. After 20 minutes, you tear the head with that thing on the ears.
- An AKG 240. good headphone, not too expensive (one hundred euros) and a fairly neutral as well. For cost of the zik on my computer or to record the night in the apartment, it's good.

But for the hi-fi, even when I prfre the Sennheiser.

I use it for over 6 years (the same) and intensive Manir seen that apart, I can hardly use real monitors.
"I like the sound of these headphones, its dynamics. I love the fact unless it is closed for work. for decision of his is excellent. but I find the long tiring especially as much cash plutt volume.
"I had one before that the AKG 240 which pretty silent too.
-The report qualitprix is ​​good when compared to the price of a good pair of speakers.
To-day if I have I take his brouzoufs ERRF, the HD 600 because it is open and the sound is more Retailer but I keep the 250 for its decision because tench and it is used to control the correct sources before recording, but mostly I offer a prampli headphone worthy of the name. Otherwise I would love to cost a Stax ...

Used for 6 months, I have not hooked to departure.
Second, the use, I've found a lot of quality.

Trs sound well made despite a lack in the low and highs a little too pronounced.
However, it is prcis trs.

Closed headphones that I find a little tiring unlike the Sony MDR 380.

I am of pre-mix and the balance over a t trs respct well. And in that sense, it is an excellent headphone.
Another small default, the output level is not the most important and it needs a prampli powerful enough.

But precision at all levels ...

Finally, I got and I'm apprcie for its precision ...

I do not know if I would do this choice .. I'll have to cost much more next time to compare more.

Previous résumé of the story: I bought a AKG141S, I changed quickly to an HD250 Linear 2. To learn more, I put a notice in the AKG141S.

This time, I tried hard even on a short trs, before buying, because it is indispensable.

I join the opinion compltement another user: the beginners we say that it seems fine but not exceptional. Then after a few hours of costs, it can not do without.

What I find Russia in this headphone:
- The accuracy of the sound: it's pretty amazing to be as prcis mean really everything. CDs recorded under poor conditions of default incredible rvlent
- Linari as the name implies: frquence seems no means any favorites, bass, treble, while
- The sparation sounds: for anyone who likes to follow the complexity of a small percussion music with little intervention or an instrument at the bottom is happiness
- The beauty of sounds: the voices for example, which are the hardest for me because the return Fidler more sophisticated musical instruments, trs stand well clear and beautiful
- The bass is not at all omniprsentes as seems to be the case on many headphones, the highs are dvelopps
- For the convenience, comfort is irrprochable

For the point a little weak this headphone:
- Low lgrement just too weak and too acute lgrement dvelopps, but it's just an impression THE FIRST hours

It is more expensive than AKG141S (from 88 145 in a store Paris 9), but the diffrence is justified sincrement

If c'tait again, I do it again.

But I would test the headphones in a store with a specially pro to advise me, and I n'achterai over the internet this kind of article not at all trivial, but rather read trs the satisfaction of a DSIR reconnatre that you can not even ourselves, for the cost.

1 week of use

I find it very neutral (no exaggeration of any frequency in my opinion) and linear (that's why he called LINEAR??) And moreover it is closed.
I tested it on different sources and rendering is still very neutral. I do not find that embellish the sound and that's what I want. In short, anyone looking for a HiFi headphones with big bass, go your way. That, in my opinion, a studio headphones.

I use it mostly for the sound (vocals, guitar) but it can be used for verification of the mix quite effective (I prefer to mix with the monitor speakers but I must admit that there is no Unlike made except, of course, we do not perceive at all the global in the same way in both ears with enclosed under a headphone or on the contrary being the skull in the open air!)

I have another Sony headphones open and not so good for the return of the spectrum (no, it's not a ghost!)

I find very good value for money and I would do this choice.